DevGuard Operator

main

Devguard-Pipeline

Badge API Documentation

Badge API

Badge API Programm ZenDiS

quay.io/jetstack/cert-manager-acmesolver

ghcr.io/l3montree-dev/devguard-operator

ghcr.io/l3montree-dev/devguard-postgresql

ghcr.io/l3montree-dev/devguard

docker.io/oryd/kratos

devguard-action

Devguard Postgresql

devguard-scanner

 Devguard-Pipeline

devguard-documentation

devguard

devguard-web

Devguard

Robot User

Badge-API

Lars Hermges

Patrick Rissmann

Sebastian Kawelke

Tim Bastin

Refaei Shikho

Frédéric Noppe

refoo0

timbastin

seb-kw

devguard-bot-dev[bot]

L3montree Cybersecurity

The scanner component of the devguard project

This is a scan for Devguard CI/CD components in a GitLab project, aimed at testing whether these components function correctly.

The documentation for the DevGuard Project

Manage your CVEs seamlessly, Integrate your Vulnerability Scanners, Documentation made easy, Compliance to security Frameworks - OWASP Incubating Project

An issue was discovered in Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF) Helm through 3.13.3. It displays values of secrets when the --dry-run flag is used. This is a security concern in some use cases, such as a --dry-run call by a CI/CD tool. NOTE: the vendor's position is that this behavior was introduced intentionally, and cannot be removed without breaking backwards compatibility (some users may be relying on these values). Also, it is not the Helm Project's responsibility if a user decides to use --dry-run within a CI/CD environment whose output is visible to unauthorized persons.

A SMB force-authentication vulnerability exists in all versions of OPA for Windows prior to v0.68.0. The vulnerability exists because of improper input validation, allowing a user to pass an arbitrary SMB share instead of a Rego file as an argument to OPA CLI or to one of the OPA Go library’s functions.

golang-jwt is a Go implementation of JSON Web Tokens. Unclear documentation of the error behavior in `ParseWithClaims` can lead to situation where users are potentially not checking errors in the way they should be. Especially, if a token is both expired and invalid, the errors returned by `ParseWithClaims` return both error codes. If users only check for the `jwt.ErrTokenExpired ` using `error.Is`, they will ignore the embedded `jwt.ErrTokenSignatureInvalid` and thus potentially accept invalid tokens. A fix has been back-ported with the error handling logic from the `v5` branch to the `v4` branch. In this logic, the `ParseWithClaims` function will immediately return in "dangerous" situations (e.g., an invalid signature), limiting the combined errors only to situations where the signature is valid, but further validation failed (e.g., if the signature is valid, but is expired AND has the wrong audience). This fix is part of the 4.5.1 release. We are aware that this changes the behaviour of an established function and is not 100 % backwards compatible, so updating to 4.5.1 might break your code. In case you cannot update to 4.5.0, please make sure that you are properly checking for all errors ("dangerous" ones first), so that you are not running in the case detailed above.

Package	Max Risk	Max CVSS	Vulnerability Count	Installed Version	Action
helm.sh/helm/v3	LOW (3.2)	CRITICAL (9.1)	1	3.15.3	No fix available
github.com/open-policy-agent/opa	LOW (1.9)	MEDIUM (6.1)	1	0.66.0	Update to version 0.68.0 to reduce total risk by 1.9
github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v4	LOW (1.1)	LOW (3.1)	1	4.5.0	Update to version 4.5.1 to reduce total risk by 1.1

/Devguard
Project
/DevGuard Operator
Repository

Identified Risks